Imagine a person who has their taxes withheld at source and question, I am more free to counter the company, just took me to pay and put it all together in a month? Even getting that information values that are retained in orgões officers in a single calendar month, with the end of the calendar year the person becomes exempt, if it receives the same income from another source that does not retain the same need not declare taxes (I speak of people who have taxes withheld at source will not rebates, declarable's residence or is not as free to provide the statement within the law) and to have the person who is exempt due to the situations described in the law, already you have to tell before and just got the media, which is the only source of information accessible to the service company when there is interest and within the limits, no book available to society, which provides only for an appeal, although the payment is to have all or the withholding tax on account of receiving any taxable income and not to receive the information in due time, year and fail to declare, when you get the value discovers that only paying a fine of R $ 165.00, only that the withholding tax was U.S. $ 97.00 (it is better to leave it) and if a value over $ 250.00 and the person does not have Internet at home is unemployed and lives of chickpeas, is counter to pay, it is better to leave beyond that there is already legislative or law requiring a person or company to sell services to other private use and prostitution, theft or begging in front of the body in order to get money to pay professional is shameful, is not both should fall, not worth it. Chat with the ombudsman is the same as getting on the street and look where their rights have to refer to those who will not solve your problem, or is the family, since it has to agree with what is on the schedule and say that are right in what they do. What is interesting is the fact it can not hire a lawyer to defend their rights within the logic if we have to bear the legal costs if we lose the battle with the said body, the lawyer also paying them, the same is not true if we won, the lawyer remains in our account, which the lawyer who will want to dive in?
And people have criticized the blue eyes of others and the earth iron in the most neguinhos and Brown's own land, as if we have an obligation to pay and have questions or information (that has always been free and under the target values is retained, which makes the issue lay not with the calendar year) the same applies if the basic rule of preference and immediate refund if no factor generator generates the presumed and the body in question does not measure ability, and of personal character ( should be the fact he has very personal) even having to check conditions, and lack of clear information and have ceased to apply in time, impose conditions as to recover values within a system that limits the state and another, offers the opportunity to double punishment, since the payment of a fine shall be paid for not having complied with the obligation and packaging Internet, pay for not having conditions, lack of resources not stupid, illiterate or disabled to prevent the writing and understanding, because the institution does not indicate professional free.
And since when asked about the fact of being deficient Lan House, that state and then say that is not stated and known to all who access the Internet in the most just for research, with programming restricted, just visit one.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário