It is interesting to help adolescents with low schooling

Cara Senhora Edna,

Of order of the Sir President of this Commission of Work, of Administration and Civil Service, Dep. Peter Fernandes, I inform what does not fit when this Commission some device of the CLT is proposing any proposition against to, but V. Sª. will be able to give beginning to the legislative process. There are three forms of a citizen of proposing a bill:
straightly, through project when one per cent of the national electorate, distributed at least by five States, was signed for, at least, with not less of tenth three per cent of the voters of each one of them (art. 61, § 2 ° of the Federal Constitution of 1988);indiretamente:moving a Deputy (that one for whom you voted, for example) to his proposal, so that he pledges himself to present project to the Chamber of the Deputies so that it is subjected to the analysis;
to present it to the Commission of Legislation Participativa, through some association, organ of class, trade union or organized entity of the civil society (except Political Party). The electronic address of the commission is clp.decom@camara.gov.br.
We wish him good luck.

Thoughtfully,

ANAMÉLIA BROOK STRAP OF ARAÚJO


Secretary of the Commission
: Edna Lucia Constantino da Conceição [mailto:ednalucia2005@yahoo.com.br]
Sent in: on Wednesday, 19 of March of 2008 19:29
For: Commission of Work, of Administration and Service Público/DECOM
I cogitate: Criminal: AT THE BOTTOM: SPEAK WITH us - 38F4356450


I am questioned the right to the access of an adolescent with low schooling to the special contract of work CLT Art 402 to 441 Act 5.598/2005 and the new Entrance hall 615 and 618 of the MTE am directing the argument, however I am already preparing other questioning since I do not stand v è adolescents dying because it has no wave for the profile you erase with high schooling and IQ, like if our schools had the profile of cuba or Chinese. it goes that questioner leaves from the questionamento. the remainder in another imail. blogspot.com
I question the beginning of the legality, since analysing the factwhose requisite is the maior/melhor notices in the special contract of work or CLT Art 402 to 441 or Art 403, Act 5.598/2005, Entrance hall 615 of 13/12/2007 and CBO which aims to establish a reasonable balance between the right of the person (access of included, equal form to adolescent and young with finality of offering possibility of insertion in the labor market) and of the rights, of the economical society and of the aplicadores of courses in the accessibility to the program leaving from the beginning of the legal security, finding, the access to leave from the evaluation according to the special condition of person in development, social inclusion and 4 wants sovereignity through the autonomy of the enterprises Art429 of the CLT, Art 170 CF in selecting the profile and function what it wants to apply or to delegate such a function to the aplicadores of courses that can apply measures and rules for entry like proofs of written evaluation (addition or subtraction and dictation, which it checks if it is in the condition of taught to read and write, or equation of 2 ° degree) that it removes pupils of institution of teaching with deficit or problems in teachers' lack, strikes, impossibility offer the disciplines regularmente with quality (of applying any plan of classroom for insufficiency of hour / classroom, automatic approval impossibilities of evaluation and the release of is studied at home what makes a habit and adversities and misfortunes that take place inside and in I tip over of the institution of teaching), problems of health, psychological and familiar, what cause school discrepancy to that what are left without treatment and appropriate help, the only condition chooses in the form of access of a program, evaluation for proofs of selection where the requisite for the entry will be for the one who has the known maior/melhor, what or the adolescent himself has relative has resources of looking the one who could qualify to the entry (mechanism very much used for cursinhos preparatorily) they exist basic beginnings that the impessoalidade that is the equality of treatment or Impersonal and general service and though it comes to interest persons or determined groups there should prevail the supremacy of the interest of the Society or in which the community is concentrated if I second inquiries more than 50 1 of the adolescents in 15, 17 they are not attending the secondary education or between 15 and 24 years and 50 1 of 35 million young persons are out of the school given, IBGE / IDJ, if (1) one in each (5) five childbirth in Brazil belongs to mother adolescent in 2006 22.161 babies and to mothers with fewer 15 years and 551.093 with age between 15 and 19 years IBGE, without counting the abortions in this age and it would be behaved by 615 of 13/12/2007 that creates and brings back to normal the activity of the aplicadores of course Act 5.598/2005 Art 8 ° I to / / / / and / II and III, being that all carrying out it what is in the Entrance hall 615 of 13/12/2007 Art 3 ° I / II / III, we might have given concrete of the one who is being excluded and I have a right denied of access to the contract of special work.
(Art 4 ° I-) it has general directives like beginning makes the social justice real since the Entities Ofertantes of courses of apprenticeship must observe and qualify socially and professional adapted the demands and diversities in the special condition of development (and if I choose only the one who has more than 7 °/º8 ° series valued by proofs of selection, since they already present the profile d (obtaining conditions of passing for the Secondary education?) and when technical level is using the term courses, LDB of the Education Art 36 § 2 ° Act 2.208 of 17/04/1997 Art 3 ° Art II 5 °, 6 °, 7 °, 8 ° always made a list to the secondary education and that in the entrance hall 615 of 13/12/2007 uses the terms courses of technical level in Art 1 ° § 2 ° and Art 4 ° I b, c, II c, III b, c, g, do 1 §1, 2 to CLT expose Art 428 like professional-technical program of apprenticeship, formation, Act 5.598/2000 and Act 2.208 of 17/04/1997 Art 4 ° uses the term technical knowledge in the question of the vocational teaching of basic level, I question if it will be the access to the work it is only to the one who has this level?