it denounces

serious fact
If adolescents with low schooling from 14 to 16 years cannot work, because it is considered a childlike work, the CLT not this wrong, since the special work is apartir 14 years Young apprentice Art 402 to 441. And does proof of selection to choose the best inside a law that is of access to all say that if to an adolescent without schooling, if quizer to work and has no condition to pass in the proofs has that to prostitute itself, or to steal, or to sell drugs, or a familiar good formation will have been to turn cameló? Does family wrinkle who receives is the family and if the adolescent has children and a family fomada, link 14, he 16, (it is only the two go inside a community) has to survive the edge of the society? Is and to compete with adults in a law that is of protection of the work of the juvenile correct? The new entrance halls of the government 615/2007, 616/2007 and 618/2007 of the MTE and the act 5.598/2005. The term vocational apprenticeship and connection with the CBO, Brazilian Classification of Occupation, (unhealthy and dangerous and nocturnal I find correctly) be able to put that there is no qualification for illiterate adolescent and semi, like if that was not existing in Brazil, being our education and inefficient, unequal politics and puts a generation to edge of the society, it can incur serious risk of esclusão of this generation. If the government complains of the demand of experience and place the preferencia for the one who already did capacitação professional the same thing it does not exclude also? Art 3 would carry 618/2007 ° I MTE. And insentivae the increase of schooling, stopping from the outside a program that stimulates and demands that the young person is in the school is to take the risk of of losing this adolescent for activities that damage his formation.