quarta-feira, 19 de maio de 2010

Ensure the 'living together'.

Ensure the 'living together'.

When we present different degrees of difficulties in social integration, coexistence or integration through the middle, so since the start of our life, we relate reciprocally with other people and interact on social situations and not compromise the environment, removing rights and subdued through laws or other mechanism to make access to the profiles given opportunities equal social conditions impossible, such as quality education in the competition for jobs and job training with access to jobs with better income, to make people understand that this deficit can be social integration, usually combined with the difficulty of approach or behavior that the family environment and developed around and see the society that prevents access to improvements, especially blacks, which are part of the majority who live in slums. I see the recent speeches of economists who have made clear that not all as the housing issue is government's obligation, even if they pay taxes like the slum dwellers, and that if the population had more access to economic opportunities as the socio-economic development to that without posing as growth conditions today with the help of the media all the slums and its inhabitants have been targeted, how to treat slum dwellers as dirty, who can not live in cleanliness and all lived in shacks that have to be pacified, to see the names that the interventions in the area of security when the non-slum dwellers, not pejorative, since these people, they think, to present consolidated habits and preferences can react in situations that are disagreeable, appears to be something that takes away the impartiality of media and is dangerous because by failing to give credit information causing the uncertainty of information as far as the legal standard is the Brazilian society, when there are interests, real estate and see the withdrawal of the poor, bringing danger to normalcy and harmony of the medium as the materials:
By Daniel Santini
daniel.santini @ folhauniversal.com.br
Sanitation
Before the agreement, the legal owners of the Prestes Maia building, and Hamuche Jorge Eduardo Amorim, came to announce that enter the court for reinstatement. Both accumulate a debt of a millionaire property tax that could be the basis for the expropriation, but not afraid of losing possession. Hamuche, who hopes to see the building to appreciate after the completion of works of the subway in the neighborhood, the mayor feels wrong to think the building earmarked for social projects. "As a community that wants to live as a class D goes to live in front of the subway that will be the largest in Latin America?" Questions, arguing that there is no place for poor in wealthy areas. "It's a mistake because of the location. In an area served by all modes of transportation, the population goes to work 'hygienically' Body 'hygienically clean', worked well with the body, mind and worked, "argues.

For the engineer and planner Luiz Kohara, Gaspar Garcia of the Center for Human Rights, an organization that defends the right to housing, is a mistake to expel people from the poor central region. Despite being cheaper to build public housing in the suburbs, the cost to the public is greater because they are areas lacking infrastructure. "We must take into account other aspects. Whilst there remains a gap in the central region, the watershed areas are occupied and the city is unsustainable, "he argues. "We need a society that integrates people. The government gives financial incentives to real estate speculators and intended for low-income population and only police
social assistance. It should not. This is what happened in Operation New Light (project from the city to try to recover the region known as 'Cracolândia'), "he says. He estimates there are about 600 empty buildings in Sao Paulo that could be used to help solve the current housing crisis.
WILSON TOSTA - 19.45, Monday, May 3, 2010
On a map of the organization Reporters Without Borders on the situation of press freedom worldwide in 2010, 175 countries divided into a spectrum of colors ranging from white (good) to black (very severe), Brazil is covered with bright orange ( with sensitive issues). The drawing was displayed today by the chairman emeritus of the RBS Group, Jayme Sirotsky, Freedom of Expression in the seminary at the School of Magistrates of the State of Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) and shows that if the country does not reach the dark orange (difficult) to Venezuela and Ecuador and is far from the black of Saudi Arabia is far from clear freedom of Canada, Australia, Belgium, Scandinavian countries and others. Comes a map of the organization Reporters Without Borders on the situation of press freedom worldwide in 2010, 175 countries divided into a spectrum of colors ranging from white (good) to black (very severe), Brazil is covered with bright orange ( with sensitive issues). The drawing was displayed today by the chairman emeritus of the RBS Group, Jayme Sirotsky, Freedom of Expression in the seminary at the School of Magistrates of the State of Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) and shows that if the country does not reach the dark orange (difficult) to Venezuela and Ecuador and is far from the black of Saudi Arabia is far from clear freedom of Canada, Australia, Belgium, Scandinavian countries and others.
Dominique Revel
Since 1995 the Brazilian government is promoting public policies aimed at continuing professional education of the workers in Brazil as a way to fight unemployment, increase the level and sources of income and promote citizenship, since the work is, constitutionally, a fundamental right of citizens.
However, the political objective to promote citizenship in a context of precarious employment relationships and to increase the informal labor market is a theoretical challenge to think and rethink the concept of citizenship. It is, in effect, rebuild the terms of the social contract in which the 'citizen-productive' - ranging from inclusion and exclusion - is a key element of capitalist production system, marked by increasing questioning its ability to ensure 'living together'.

Nenhum comentário: